Session length
Psychotherapy codes have ranges of time. 90832 16-37 minutes. 90834 38-52. 90837 53 and up. The note must support the code, never the other way around.

Session billed 90837, 45 minutes. An add-on code with no separate time for therapy in the note. A claim submitted to the medical plan where the benefit is owned by a behavioural health vendor. They add up quickly on a full caseload, and each one costs a practice a denial.
Mental Billing provides therapy, psychiatry, testing and integrated practices with eligibility checks, coding review, claim submission, denial work, payment posting and A/R follow up. We cover things related to your practice.
For your outpatient services, everything from eligibility, coding, claims, posting and follow-up is integrated.
✓ Benefit and eligibility checks
✓ coding and claim review
✓ denial and A/R follow-up
✓ posting and reconciliation
Payment depends on what was done, how long it lasted, who did it, which plan covers it and where the claim has to go. Make one of those mistakes and a pretty-looking claim can still remain unpaid.
Psychotherapy codes have ranges of time. 90832 16-37 minutes. 90834 38-52. 90837 53 and up. The note must support the code, never the other way around.
Intake evaluations, therapy, medication management, testing, group sessions all have their own coding & documentation rules.
Active coverage of approved sessions does not mean more visits are approved. Many plans cover a certain number of sessions or a time period and additional care may not be reimbursed.
Some employers and insurers will outsource mental health benefits to a vendor, such as Optum, Carelon or Evernorth, each with their own payer ID, portal and claim rules.
Each payer’s participation record must match the billing and rendering provider on the claim including taxonomy codes and licence type.
Place of service, modifier 95, covered services and coordination of benefits vary from one payer to the next and sometimes from one program to another.
The rules vary depending on the type of payer and clinician, so what works for one practice may not work for another.
Scheduled reviews show you the payers and codes that keep coming up so you can fix them once and for all.
One bad claim usually doesn’t matter. A load of them do, through late payments, repeat work, and ever growing receivables.
We log the number of sessions that are approved for each plan and for what dates and then flag when reauthorisation is due, before the next claim is submitted. The payer still makes the coverage decisions.
A 45 minute note billed as 90837 can get a denial or recoupment. Codes 90833, 90836 and 90838 require documentation of psychotherapy time separately from the medical work and are above and beyond an E/M visit. We compare the note to the code and send mismatches to the clinician
If a plan carves out behavioural health, the claim goes to the vendor’s payer ID, not the medical plan. Instead of guessing, we read the instructions for each plan.
An NPI is not proof that a clinician is credentialed with a plan. We verify the enrolment status, effective dates and taxonomy with what the claim states.
Place of service 02 or 10, modifier 95 and covered-service lists are payer and program specific. We don't try a single combination everywhere, but we do check the current policy for each plan.
Payments are posted against contract rates and remittance and then unpaid claims are worked by age. Some differences are valid corrections, some old balances are uncollectable.
We track every claim from the first benefit cheque to the final reconciliation. The exact amount depends on your service contract.
We verify active coverage, outpatient mental health benefits, copays and deductibles, authorisation rules and whether the benefit is managed by a separate vendor. The result is what the payer reports that day. That is not a guarantee of payment.
We review the note, diagnosis, procedure code, provider information and claim data. We review evaluations, therapy, testing and medication management separately and ask clinicians if a note could support a more specific diagnosis than what was billed
Claims are validated against payer edits and provider data before submission and followed up until paid or denied. Front-end work is done carefully, but will not guarantee clean claims or approval.
We read the payer’s reason, find the cause, fix what we can fix, gather records and appeal when the facts support it. Rejections and denials require different remedies and payer rules determine results.
Review Payments, adjustments and patient balances are posted to the appropriate claim and line. With contract rates on file, we compare them to what has been paid and chase gaps against the remittance.
We work aged claims, status checks, outstanding record requests and filing or appeal deadlines. All open items have a note and balances are sorted by age and payer.
We keep accurate coverage information and payer order for patients who have more than one plan, including those who have both Medicare and Medicaid. Secondary claims are dependent on the primary payment.
We’ll review your current process, payers, systems and those claims that never seem to close.
Get your free reviewBilling rules differ from service to service. The claim has to be consistent with the note, the clinician’s licence and the payor’s policy.
Individual (90832, 90834, 90837), Family (90846, 90847), and Group (90853) are reviewed for time, attendees and clinician license. The note needs to support the interactive complexity add-on (90785) separately.
Intake evaluations (90791, 90792) and E/M visits have different rules than therapy. If an E/M is combined with 90833, 90836 or 90838, the note must indicate separate time for the psychotherapy.
For claims in the 96130 to 96139 range and brief screening (96127), you’ll need to document time, who did the test and the supporting report. Some plans want to have testing authorised first.
Practices that integrate therapy, prescribing, testing and groups need one workflow for all services, but each service needs to be treated on its own terms. Collaborative care codes (99492-99494) require monthly time tracking and registry requirements.
This is a normal order of things. The stages you go through are based on your practice and services in your agreement.
Review current billing, payer mix, systems, and ongoing issues.
If provided, check coverage, visit limits and payer details.
Compare the claim with the note and payer rules.
Route each claim to the correct payer or behavioural health vendor.
Track rejections and denials and note the reason.
Record payments and adjustments and look for gaps.
Work open balances, record deadlines, and unresolved items.
Use denial and ageing reports to identify repeat issues.
We work within the platforms behavioural health practices already use. What is important is that the charges, diagnoses, provider data, payer information and payments are consistent between our system and yours.
What we can do depends on your platform, access permissions and clearinghouse setup. All these we verify during the review.
Often practices look for speciality help when a general setup for billing does not capture behavioural health details. We build our follow-up around them.
All accounts are reviewed for time-based codes, carve-outs, visit limits and clinician enrolment.
Benefits and approved sessions are documented at intake and reviewed as treatment progresses.
Coding and claim data are verified before a claim is submitted.
We break down denials by root cause and track by payer.
Assign each payment to a claim and identify any gaps.
Unpaid claims are categorised by age and payer, with deadlines highlighted.
This same workflow works for a small therapy practice or a group with prescribers, testing and group programs.
The results are driven by payer decisions, documentation and the mix of your patients. We do not guarantee no denials or a collection outcome. Our speciality is billing and we give you a clear picture of the status of each claim.
A billing team cannot substitute for clinical documentation or a clinician's compliance responsibilities. It can catch places where the note and claim don't match up.
Confirm that procedure and diagnosis codes are true representation of information in the record.
Compare the documented minutes to the billed code and to current CPT guidance.
Maintain taxonomy, enrolment, payer and claim information as per each payer’s requirements.
Safeguard patient information at every step. Psychotherapy notes maintained separate from the main record receive additional HIPAA protection. Substance use disorder records subject to 42 CFR Part 2 have more stringent consent rules.
Comply with federal and state regulations and payer policies. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act generally requires that financial requirements and treatment limits on mental health benefits be no more stringent than those on medical benefits, depending on the type of plan.
Common questions answered about scope, payers, approvals, coding and follow-up.
They’re outpatient mental health practice revenue cycle services. They manage eligibility verification, code review, claim submission, denial management, payment posting and A/R follow-up. The scope differs by agreement.
Payment is often based on logged hours of the session. Visit limits are common. A separate vendor may administer the benefit. A clinician's licence and taxonomy can determine how a claim is processed. Add a layer for telehealth rules.
There are a few reasons that outpatient behavioural health claims get denied.
Some of the more common are: expired approvals, session limits, billed code that does not match documented time, claims sent to the wrong payer, enrollment/taxonomy mismatches, telehealth coding errors, and coordination of benefits. The next step depends on the payer’s reason for denial.
A carve-out is a contract between a health plan and a separate managed behavioural health company to administer the plan’s mental health benefits. Claims could go to that company's payer ID, not the medical plan's. They check every plan because they have different plans and different arrangements.
When verifying, approved visit counts and date ranges are documented and compared against upcoming claims to identify reauthorisation. Monitoring the process helps, but does not ensure approval or payment.
They may be. Place of service, modifiers, covered services and documentation rules vary by payer, program, and service. We review the payer’s existing policy before billing.
Payment posting can show differences from contracted rates and A/R follow-up tracks claims that haven’t paid. Each difference is compared to the contract, claim and explanation of benefits. Not all open balances are collectible.
The first step is to take a moment to think about what you want to say. This will help you organise your thoughts and make sure you are clear about what you want to communicate. It’s important to be aware of your audience and tailor your message to their needs. Once you have a clear idea of what you want to say, you can begin to write. It’s important to be concise and to the point. Don’t use jargon or complex language. Use simple words and short sentences. If you are writing a letter :
A review can serve as a launch point for practice owners, billing managers and clinical directors who are dealing with repeat denials, gaps in approval, carve-out routing, coding questions, underpayments or ageing receivables. Good billing support is built around your payers, clinicians and service mix.
Get Your Free Billing Review